Evidence
Ethics frameworks multiplied while the US and UK stepped back from joint declarations
| Date | Case | Country | What happened | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 2024 | OECD AI Principles revised | OECD | Updated for generative and general-purpose AI | Source |
| Jan 28, 2025 | Antiqua et Nova | Vatican | Doctrinal note on AI and human intelligence | Source |
| Feb 2025 | Paris AI Action Summit declaration | France | China signed; the US and UK did not | Source |
| Jun 2025 | UNESCO Global Forum, Bangkok | Thailand | More than 70 countries in the readiness program | Source |
| Oct 8, 2023 | Trial Measures for Ethics Review of Science and Technology | China | Ethics committees required for sensitive research, including autonomous decision systems | Source |
Rules
Ethics frameworks are voluntary except China's ethics review measures
| Rule | Jurisdiction | What it requires | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| UNESCO Recommendation on the Ethics of AI | Global | Readiness and ethical impact assessments | Adopted Nov 2021 |
| OECD AI Principles | OECD | Trustworthy AI principles | Revised May 2024 |
| Trial Measures for Ethics Review | China | Ethics committees and expert re-review | Issued Oct 8, 2023 |
| Paris Statement on Inclusive and Sustainable AI | Global | Voluntary commitments | Feb 2025 |
Status colors: green in force, blue voluntary standard or framework, amber adopted and phasing in, gray draft or pending, red withdrawn.
Record
Page Record
- Datasets
- ai_trust_evidence.csv (5 rows); registry incidents (0 linked)
- Key sources
- OECD AI Principles revised
Antiqua et Nova
Paris AI Action Summit declaration
UNESCO Global Forum, Bangkok
Trial Measures for Ethics Review of Science and Technology - Last verified
- October 2026