AI Wearables

Glasses, rings and watches with cameras, microphones and health sensors.

EssilorLuxottica sold more than 7 million Meta AI glasses in 2025, against 2 million across the two years before. Reports of secret filming and contractor review of intimate footage led to a US class action and an August 2026 fix that stops the camera when the LED is covered.

AI wearable sales: Meta AI glasses, 2025 7.0; Global smart glasses, H1 2025 4.1 (IDC); Oura rings, 2025 about 3.0; China smart glasses, H1 2025 about 1.0 AI WEARABLE SALES Meta AI glasses, 2025 7.0 Global smart glasses, H1 2025 4.1 (IDC) Oura rings, 2025 about 3.0 China smart glasses, H1 2025 about 1.0 UNITS, MILLIONS; PERIODS DIFFER
Meta AI glasses sold, 2025
7M+
Meta share of smart glasses
75.7%
Oura rings sold since 2015
5.5M
Registry incidents
0

Deployments

Meta glasses dominate; Alibaba and Xiaomi sell the Chinese counterparts

Meta holds 75.7% of the global smart glasses market, per IDC. Alibaba's Quark glasses link to Alipay payments and Taobao shopping. Apple Watch hypertension alerts run in the background and notify the wearer without being asked.

Flagship wearables deployments
DeploymentDeveloper / operatorWhereScaleAutonomyStatusControls declared
Ray-Ban Meta and Oakley Meta glassesMeta with EssilorLuxottica / MetaGlobal7 million+ sold in 2025 (Dec 2025)Assistant with cameraOn sale; class action pendingRecording LED; camera stops if LED is covered
Quark AI GlassesAlibabaChinaNot disclosed (Nov 2025)AssistantOn saleNot disclosed
Apple Watch hypertension notificationsApple150+ countries and regions1 million+ expected alerts in year one (Sep 2025)Passive background analysisFDA-clearedNot a diagnostic

Recent events

  • Harvard students combined Ray-Ban Meta glasses with PimEyes in October 2024 to identify strangers in real time.
  • A BBC investigation in January 2026 found influencers secretly filming women with Meta glasses.
  • Swedish papers reported in February 2026 that Kenyan contractors labeled glasses footage including nudity.
  • A class action, Bartone v. Meta, was filed on March 4, 2026.
  • IDC projects more than 40 million smart glasses shipments by 2029.

Attack surface

Two of ten attack-surface dimensions rate very significant or critical

No dimension rates critical. Ratings use five levels, from limited to critical, and cover the paths an attacker or a failure can take into the agent.

Attack surface by dimension: Physical access significant; Identity and authentication significant; Command and control channels significant; Perception and sensors very significant; Connectivity surface significant; OTA and update pipeline significant; Data capture and retention very significant; Integrations and permissions moderate; Behavioral and policy boundary moderate; Multi-agent coordination limited Physical access SIGNIFICANT Identity SIGNIFICANT Command and control SIGNIFICANT Perception VERY SIGNIFICANT Connectivity SIGNIFICANT OTA updates SIGNIFICANT Data capture VERY SIGNIFICANT Integrations MODERATE Behavior boundary MODERATE Multi-agent LIMITED
Attack surface rating by dimension. Longer, darker bars are rated higher.
Wearables attack surface by dimension
DimensionRatingWhy
Physical accessSignificantWearables are typically small and frequently set down
Identity and authenticationSignificantDevice identity is typically tied to a manufacturer account and a paired phone
Command and control channelsSignificantVoice command, gesture interfaces, paired phone control, manufacturer backend
Perception and sensorsVery significantCameras, microphones, biosensors are the primary value of the device
Connectivity surfaceSignificantBluetooth pairing with phone, WiFi for some models, cellular in emerging always-on designs
OTA and update pipelineSignificantFirmware updates flow through manufacturer infrastructure
Data capture and retentionVery significantMost distinctive dimension for wearables
Integrations and permissionsModerateIntegration with paired phone applications, third-party AI assistants, manufacturer ecosystems
Behavioral and policy boundaryModerateOn-device AI processing is bounded by manufacturer policy
Multi-agent coordinationLimitedCurrent wearables do not coordinate as fleets

Incidents

No registry incident involves wearables yet

The 137AI Incident Registry logs an incident when an agent's failure or misuse caused harm or a regulator acted, and public sources name the developer, the failed control and how it was found. No wearables case meets that bar yet. Candidates go on the review list in the registry methodology.

Rules

Wearable cameras fall under face and privacy law, not device rules

Rules that apply to wearables
RuleJurisdictionWhat it requiresStatus
EU AI Act Article 5(1)(e)EUBans building face databases by untargeted scrapingIn force Feb 2, 2025
CAC and MPS face recognition measuresChinaConsent and notice; bans in hotel rooms and public restroomsEffective Jun 1, 2025
FDA general wellness guidance (revised)USWearables estimating values like blood pressure can be wellness productsJan 2026

Status colors: green in force, blue voluntary standard or framework, amber adopted and phasing in, gray draft or pending, red withdrawn.

Record

Page Record

Agent class
Personal and ambient
Datasets
ai_deployments.csv (3 rows for this page); ai_attack_surface.csv (10 rows); ai_incidents.csv (0 linked)
Key sources
Meta glasses sales (Road to VR)
IDC smart glasses (36Kr)
Smart glasses privacy (Barnes and Thornburg)
Last verified
October 2026